Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

RANDOLPH DUKE THE AGS LOVE YOU

They made that statement in response to the Colts issue. That's not the wording in the trademark documentation.

 
They made that statement in response to the Colts issue. That's not the wording in the trademark documentation.
Who cares. The pleadings in the Colts suit were fraudulent.

The school administrators are getting their opportunity to go on the record and explain all this and I assure you the explanation will be on the desk of the state Attorney General in due course.

Until the school speaks and the Attorney General opines on the matter, nothing we say mattes one bit, so let's just wait for all this to start unraveling and then we can see where things stand.

I don't expect a member of the cult to find fault in the behavior of the cult leaders, no matter what the behavior or how long they have been acting as they have. It is a characteristic of a cult that its members never question the decisions of its leaders. Hence the phrase "drink the kool-aid."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, again with the ad hominem. How typically aggy.

It's been fun, kids, but when all you have left is squeezing your testicles and flinging poo as opposed to discussing the facts, aggys become rather tiresome.

The university is being asked for their on-the-record statement and we will go from there.

The claim the tradition started in 1922 is an outright fraud and not only is your "tradition" going to be exposed as an outright fraud, but so is your Honor Code. The only question I have to ask you guys is what you truly stand for.

Just wait till this all hits the fan. It will be fun watching your powers of denial rise to yet another level. If only your sense of honesty and integrity were half as strong.
I don't believe it is ad hominem. Verbosity, consuming preoccupations with narrow topics of interest, inability to see other points of view, inability to understand intent and misapplying emotions to subjects.... These are all Aspergers symptoms. There's nothing wrong with having it, nor does it diminish you or your points. It merely helps people around you understand how and why these interactions play out the way they do.

 
Until the school speaks and the Attorney General opines on the matter
The AG doesn't give two shits about this whole thing. All the AG wants is this "Duke" psycho to stop sending them emails.
 
Lets assume that 100% the Duke is right? What are the ramifications? Who will really care?  Serious question. 

 
The reason the university has been "successful" in defending the trademark is because they file fraudulent pleadings in court to do so. This time, they were lucky enough to get an aggy who had no personal integrity and allowed the fraudulent pleadings to elicit a settlement. How is that "success"? This is just more fraudulent behavior and a judge who utterly lacks personal integrity (or who never read the pleadings).
So you are besmirching the integrity of a highly regarded Judge with impunity? Have you ever presented or even heard arguments in front of Judge Lake? As for those who are counting, Judge Lake is an A&M grad but also a UT Law grad graduating #1 in his class. 

 
Lets assume that 100% the Duke is right? What are the ramifications? Who will really care?  Serious question. 

Even if he's 100% correct (which he's not close to) he'd have to prove it in court, or an actual professional would have to. They wouldn't touch the case if Duke himself was doing it.

Even if Duke happened to get it to court, he'd have to prove beyond a doubt that Texas A&M didn't have ownership of the trademark. He can't even use the Gill story, or stories because they all contradict each other or are vague enough to not be viable for a ruling.

Then you could possibly say it's a generic enough term that it should be let go into public domain. But that doesn't work since A&M has continually used it for almost a century, and they've certainly used it constantly since the trademark was granted.

So far several NFL teams have come forward and said that they have just as much of a right to use it as A&M does. A&M has won every single one of these, basically cementing their right to own it.

Like I said, even if Duke was 100% correct about the Gill story, there's not enough evidence to turn over the trademark in a court of law.

 
Lets assume that 100% the Duke is right? What are the ramifications? Who will really care? Serious question.
To my understanding, if he's right that the University can't provide proof of the claim that the university adopted the "12th Man" in 1922 because of Gill's actions - nothing changes. Date of first use in commerce is more important than first use in spoken word. They'd walk into a courtroom with a 1921 Battalion, showing first use before the date on file, and be fine.

 
I don't believe it is ad hominem. Verbosity, consuming preoccupations with narrow topics of interest, inability to see other points of view, inability to understand intent and misapplying emotions to subjects.... These are all Aspergers symptoms. There's nothing wrong with having it, nor does it diminish you or your points. It merely helps people around you understand how and why these interactions play out the way they do.
I wasn't aware you were a mental health professional. Maybe you can opine on the subject of cult mentality.

Go call Jason Cook. He is having a bad day. Not as bad as he will have in the near future, but for him, this is a bad day.

And for God's sake, did they teach you nothing other than fish camp fairy tales at the cow college? A "symptom" is a characteristic of a disease. A "trait" is a characteristic of an organism.

Asperger's Syndrome isn't a disease. It is a disorder. Those who suffer from Asperger's Syndrome have traits. They don't have symptoms. 

Trust me, I am laughing hysterically at you idiots as this all falls apart. I appreciate the humor of the position you and the university administration have painted yourselves into. Since you were taught so much about Asperger's at the cow college, I'm sure you understand how that factors into your diagnosis, Dr. 

(see what I just did there?)

 
To my understanding, if he's right that the University can't provide proof of the claim that the university adopted the "12th Man" in 1922 because of Gill's actions - nothing changes. Date of first use in commerce is more important than first use in spoken word. They'd walk into a courtroom with a 1921 Battalion, showing first use before the date on file, and be fine.
So you are a mental health professional AND a legal professional. Interesting.

Let's just refer all the legal aspects to the state Attorney General. Call Jason Cook and ask him if he wants to refer this to the AG or if he would rather I do it.

Matter of fact, give him my email and have him contact me about it.

utrandolphduke @ gmail.

 
Go call Jason Cook. He is having a bad day. Not as bad as he will have in the near future, but for him, this is a bad day.
You keep saying this, what proof do you have that he's having a bad day. Don't say "I'm in the know" or "top people are working on this" or "wait and see, it will be glorious".

Because so far you have spoken nothing of substance, EVERYTHING that will supposedly "take down A&M" has been said only by you or is in your head.

Until you can give solid proof that you have actually accomplished anything, I think you should remain silent until you do.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My what an infestation of AGGY we have today. Did a herd of sheep come through earlier? LOL

IF there was nothing to Randolph Duke's info and he was indeed just full of shit – WHY WOULD THERE BE SO MANY AGGY ON THIS BOARD TODAY?

And isn't it just like Aggy to defy their words with their own actions . . . AT THE SAME TIME? LOL

Word to the wise which today is limited on this board – Duke is a coon dog. He's been on the scent. He knows where the coon is and has tree'd him. All he's doing is waiting on the hunters to arrive.

Duke is a researcher. It's his thing. This isn't his first rodeo. He's very successful at it. He's got his faults just like everyone else and it's easy to show up on this board for one or two days and disappear when the caca hits the fan blades.

Get your shots in now. They're meaningless because no one here takes a word you say seriously simply because of reasons stated in the first of this post. Lord knows you won't be around when Duke is standing on aggy's chest and smoking a stogie.

 
Who is Jason Cook?

A friend wants to know.
I know this should not astonish you coming from Charles M Satterfield III but Jason Cook has nothing to do Texas A&M trademark responsibilities. Since he is waiting on Jason's response, the Texas AG maybe waiting a while.

 
It's meaningless just like everything that Duke has posted. What exactly has he been successful at? I honestly would love to know a real world example of him accomplishing anything.

 
It's meaningless just like everything that Duke has posted. What exactly has he been successful at? I honestly would love to know a real world example of him accomplishing anything.
Give me a week or two and you will have the example of both the invalidating of the TAMU 12th Man trademark and having the senior TAMU administration exposed for their scheme.

Pretty impressive resume, wouldn't you say?

 
It's meaningless just like everything that Duke has posted. What exactly has he been successful at? I honestly would love to know a real world example of him accomplishing anything.
he woke up this morning and responded to this thread.  next.

 
Back
Top Bottom