BeardedTexan
New member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 69
They made that statement in response to the Colts issue. That's not the wording in the trademark documentation.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!Who cares. The pleadings in the Colts suit were fraudulent.They made that statement in response to the Colts issue. That's not the wording in the trademark documentation.
I don't believe it is ad hominem. Verbosity, consuming preoccupations with narrow topics of interest, inability to see other points of view, inability to understand intent and misapplying emotions to subjects.... These are all Aspergers symptoms. There's nothing wrong with having it, nor does it diminish you or your points. It merely helps people around you understand how and why these interactions play out the way they do.Ah, again with the ad hominem. How typically aggy.
It's been fun, kids, but when all you have left is squeezing your testicles and flinging poo as opposed to discussing the facts, aggys become rather tiresome.
The university is being asked for their on-the-record statement and we will go from there.
The claim the tradition started in 1922 is an outright fraud and not only is your "tradition" going to be exposed as an outright fraud, but so is your Honor Code. The only question I have to ask you guys is what you truly stand for.
Just wait till this all hits the fan. It will be fun watching your powers of denial rise to yet another level. If only your sense of honesty and integrity were half as strong.
The AG doesn't give two shits about this whole thing. All the AG wants is this "Duke" psycho to stop sending them emails.Until the school speaks and the Attorney General opines on the matter
So you are besmirching the integrity of a highly regarded Judge with impunity? Have you ever presented or even heard arguments in front of Judge Lake? As for those who are counting, Judge Lake is an A&M grad but also a UT Law grad graduating #1 in his class.The reason the university has been "successful" in defending the trademark is because they file fraudulent pleadings in court to do so. This time, they were lucky enough to get an aggy who had no personal integrity and allowed the fraudulent pleadings to elicit a settlement. How is that "success"? This is just more fraudulent behavior and a judge who utterly lacks personal integrity (or who never read the pleadings).
and yet we are all here still reading....This thread has become pointless kinda like the topic in my opinion.
Lets assume that 100% the Duke is right? What are the ramifications? Who will really care? Serious question.
To my understanding, if he's right that the University can't provide proof of the claim that the university adopted the "12th Man" in 1922 because of Gill's actions - nothing changes. Date of first use in commerce is more important than first use in spoken word. They'd walk into a courtroom with a 1921 Battalion, showing first use before the date on file, and be fine.Lets assume that 100% the Duke is right? What are the ramifications? Who will really care? Serious question.
I wasn't aware you were a mental health professional. Maybe you can opine on the subject of cult mentality.I don't believe it is ad hominem. Verbosity, consuming preoccupations with narrow topics of interest, inability to see other points of view, inability to understand intent and misapplying emotions to subjects.... These are all Aspergers symptoms. There's nothing wrong with having it, nor does it diminish you or your points. It merely helps people around you understand how and why these interactions play out the way they do.
So you are a mental health professional AND a legal professional. Interesting.To my understanding, if he's right that the University can't provide proof of the claim that the university adopted the "12th Man" in 1922 because of Gill's actions - nothing changes. Date of first use in commerce is more important than first use in spoken word. They'd walk into a courtroom with a 1921 Battalion, showing first use before the date on file, and be fine.
You keep saying this, what proof do you have that he's having a bad day. Don't say "I'm in the know" or "top people are working on this" or "wait and see, it will be glorious".Go call Jason Cook. He is having a bad day. Not as bad as he will have in the near future, but for him, this is a bad day.
he's a fine american actor in the soap opera industryWho is Jason Cook?
A friend wants to know.
I know this should not astonish you coming from Charles M Satterfield III but Jason Cook has nothing to do Texas A&M trademark responsibilities. Since he is waiting on Jason's response, the Texas AG maybe waiting a while.Who is Jason Cook?
A friend wants to know.
Give me a week or two and you will have the example of both the invalidating of the TAMU 12th Man trademark and having the senior TAMU administration exposed for their scheme.It's meaningless just like everything that Duke has posted. What exactly has he been successful at? I honestly would love to know a real world example of him accomplishing anything.
he woke up this morning and responded to this thread. next.It's meaningless just like everything that Duke has posted. What exactly has he been successful at? I honestly would love to know a real world example of him accomplishing anything.